top of page
Search

Banning It Proves Him Right

  • Writer: Vickie
    Vickie
  • Mar 22, 2023
  • 2 min read

ree

Holy moley. Where do I start? This meaty tome walks us step by step prior to the earliest days of the fledgling U.S. to the midst of 45's presidency.


According to the American Library Association (thanks, Wikipedia), in 2020, it was the #2 most banned or challenged book. Here's what I've read regarding the reason(s) that this book has been banned:


"because of author’s public statements, and because of claims that the book contains 'selective storytelling incidents' and does not encompass racism against all people."


Hmm . . . Seems like it's a book about Black people, so why would he talk about all the other people in this country who have been victimized by racism? There are lots of books out there about those folks, and it's pretty sad that there's enough fodder there to fill more than a few library shelves. Oh, I get it. I think they mean White people . . . yes, the White people have been so maligned. Waah.


Oddly, perhaps, learning about the constant barrage of stealthily endorsed books, laws, policies and practices which formed the cultural mindset of the day made me rethink how I would have felt about Black people had I lived in the time of slavery (or Reconstruction, for that matter). Would I have been someone more enlightened than the masses? Or would I have been the norm--complacent, content in the fact that what was going on was somehow right? I know what I'd like to think I would have thought, but the messaging was so complete, and so pervasive, I'm embarrassed to say I'm not sure. So while this may heft some of the onus of responsibility from the hoi polloi, no one is exempt. Because as Kendi stresses, behaviors beget policy which in turn begets beliefs. And the circle keeps turning.


Honestly, I found this book to be admirably diplomatic. There were some scathing narratives of course, not because the author sensationalized the stories, but because the circumstances were embarrassingly horrific on their own. I guess the issue is that he reported it at all, and therein lies the rub. Keep things under the rug where they belong and there won't be any trouble? We've done that long enough. People who read the entire book can attest to the fact that the author absolutely looks out for other victims of "isms", including White people, is very methodical in his reportage, and knows his topic. I would pay lots of $ to see a debate between Dr. Kendi and anyone on any panel who has banned this book. It's a keeper.

ree

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page